With the closing of the great Babylonian academies, there ceased sicuro be any formally acknowledged center of Torah authority

With the closing of the great Babylonian academies, there ceased sicuro be any formally acknowledged center of Torah authority

However, numerous codes, based on the Talmud and the decisions of the Geonim were compiled by leading rabbis, and they achieved almost universal recognition.

Most noteworthy among these were the codes of Rabbi Yitzchak Al-Fasi (Rif; 1013-1103 CE) and Rabbi Asher ben Yechiel (Rosh; 1250-1328 CE), as well as the Yad HaChazaka of Rabbi Moses Maimonides (Rambam; 1135-1204 CE). The rabbis of this period are known as Rishonim or “first [codifiers].”

The rete informatica that was most widely accepted, however, was the Shulchan Aruch (Code of Jewish Law) written by Rabbi Yosef Benevolo (1488-1575 CE), which took into account almost all of the earlier codes. Since the Shulchan Aruch followed the practices of the Sephardic practices, a gloss was added onesto it by Rabbi Moshe Isserles (1520-1527 CE), including all the Ashkenazic customs.

With the publication of the Shulchan Aruch, the period of the Rishonim came esatto an end, and the period of the Acharonim or “later [codifiers]” began. The opinions of the Rishonim gained almost universal acceptance through the Shulchan Aruch, and therefore, the Acharonim usually do not oppose them. While the Acharonim ong opinions found con the Rishonim they do not dispute them without conclusive evidence.”

Mediante such cases, it is preferable to follow the rulings of verso living authority, as it is written, “You shall come

The Shulchan Aruch was not the individual opinion of its authors, but per compilation of opinions found sopra the works of the Rishonim which had gained the widest acceptance. Because of the near universal acceptance of the Shulchan Aruch, its decisions are considered binding, unless otherwise indicated by the leading authorities of succeeding generations.

Since the Shulchan Aruch was the standard of Torah law, it became the subject of many commentaries which expounded, and occasionally disputes its opinions. Many of those which were printed alongside the Shulchan Aruch were almost universally accepted.

There were a great many accepted authorities, both among the commentators preciso the Shulchan Aruch, and among the writers of Come messaggio di qualcuno milfaholic responsa (teshuvot). These applied Torah law onesto individual cases, and often batteria binding precedents. Over the years, various compilations of these later opinions were published.

Nevertheless, verso recognized Torah scholar ple Talmudic proof or an unequivocal tradition that per particular decision was not generally accepted. preciso the Judge who shall be con those days” (Deut. 17:9).

Per every generation, there are indivis rabbis who, because of their great scholarship and piety, are generally accepted as religious leaders and authorities, as it is written, “You must observe all that they decide for you” (Deut. ). Although this commandment relates specifically esatto the Sanhedrin, it also applies preciso the religious leaders of each generation.

Just as a religious pubblico must be outstanding in wisdom and scholarship, so must he be distinguished in piety and observance. It is thus written, “They shall seek the Torah from his lips, for he is an angel of the Nobile of Hosts” (Malachi 2:7). This is interpreted sicuro mean that we should only seek onesto learn the Torah from per rabbi who resembles an angel sopra holiness and piety. If per person is not outstanding sopra piety and observance, he is not worthy of the prestige and authority of verso religious pubblico, no matter how great his scholarship.

This is per general rule

An unopposed decision, whether given by a contemporary religious amministrativo or found con an accepted code, should be accepted, even if it is not mentioned by other authorities.

Whenever there is verso dispute between two equally great authorities, whether they are contemporary sicuro each other or not, we di nuovo as per the case of any other questionable circumstance. If the case involves per law from the Torah, the stricter opinion must be followed, while if it involves rabbinical law, the more lenient opinion is followed.

Geef een reactie

Het e-mailadres wordt niet gepubliceerd. Vereiste velden zijn gemarkeerd met *